Sen. Ted Cruz is demanding impeachment for a federal judge after a gag order tied to the Arctic Frost probe reportedly kept senators in the dark while the FBI and DOJ swept up phone records and targeted conservative groups. The case raises fresh questions about judicial overreach, aggressive federal investigations, and whether constitutional protections for lawmakers were sidelined in a politically charged operation.
Republicans say the gag order signed by Judge James Boasberg prevented AT&T from notifying Sen. Cruz about a subpoena for his phone records, a move Cruz called unacceptable and worthy of impeachment. At the center of the controversy is the claim that investigators used secrecy tools to hide surveillance of political opponents rather than to protect bona fide national security interests.
Judge Boasberg ordered that I not be informed that my cellphone records had been subpoenaed because he believed that I’d tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses.
That’s a complete abuse of judicial power, and Boasberg should be impeached. pic.twitter.com/8lcxFnBVs0
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) October 30, 2025
The FBI targeted: The FBI targeted the following Members of Congress: Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Sen. Bill Hagerty ,R-Tenn., Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa. These names read like a list of congressional critics who have faced aggressive scrutiny while serving in public office.
U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-IA, said that former FBI special counsel Jack Smith abused his power to investigate Republicans. “Arctic Frost was the vehicle by which FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors could improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus,” Grassley said in a news conference. He added that, contrary to public statements from prosecutors, the operation looked like a broad fishing expedition rather than a narrowly tailored probe.
Sen. Cruz and others argue that a judge who allowed such secrecy to cover sweeping investigative work crossed a line that demands accountability. The push for impeachment is framed not just as a partisan response but as a guard-rail defense for separation of powers and for members of Congress who deserve to know when their communications are targeted.
The story has become a flashpoint for conservatives who see this as another example of federal law enforcement weaponized against political opponents. Leaders on the right are stressing that when the justice system cloaks actions that affect lawmakers, it undermines trust in the entire legal process and invites demands for corrective action.
Trump posted on social media about the news.
The reporting and commentary come after public disclosures that the Biden administration’s agencies targeted nearly 100 conservative groups and individuals, including Turning Point USA. That scale of scrutiny has amplified calls from Republicans to investigate not only the investigative tactics but also the decision-making that led to targeting conservative organizations and lawmakers.
Legal experts on the right say any judge who sanctions secrecy that limits a lawmaker’s ability to seek redress should face strong review. Supporters of impeachment argue the process would let the Senate examine whether the gag order and related authorizations were legally and constitutionally justified, and whether a judge who enabled overbroad investigations should remain on the bench.
Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.
 
				 
															



