Sen. Rand Paul has moved to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after Fauci repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during a July 29 Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing, setting up a committee vote that could send the dispute to the full Senate and, potentially, the Justice Department.
Sen. Rand Paul followed through on his public threat by filing a contempt resolution after Dr. Anthony Fauci declined to answer dozens of questions at the July 29 hearing. Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times while testifying under subpoena, and Republicans say that refusal obstructed congressional oversight into COVID-19 origins and related actions.
At the center of the GOP argument is the claim that Fauci’s presidential pardon removed any Fifth Amendment shield and that his opening remarks waived any remaining privilege. Senators on the committee pressed that point repeatedly, arguing that a sitting pardon and voluntary testimony change the legal calculus for pleading the Fifth.
BREAKING: Sen. Rand Paul is moving to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment over a hundred times during last week’s Senate hearing.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee is set to vote Thursday morning on Paul’s contempt resolution, which says Fauci refused to answer questions despite being under subpoena.
Paul argues Fauci’s Fifth Amendment protections no longer applied because of his presidential pardon and that Fauci also waived any remaining privilege by delivering opening testimony.
Fauci refused to answer anyway, which Paul says amounts to obstruction of a congressional investigation.
Fauci pushed back hard in his opening remarks, accusing Sen. Paul of running what he called an “unhinged” campaign aimed at putting him behind bars. He said, “The only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something – anything – that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, ‘behind bars.’”
Republican senators reacted sharply after the hearing, calling for accountability and possible criminal referrals. They framed the contempt move as a necessary step to enforce congressional subpoenas and to prevent future witnesses from stonewalling serious investigations into pandemic policy and lab-origin questions.
Sen. Josh Hawley went further on the hearing floor, arguing that Fauci had no Fifth Amendment cover because of the pardon and that the plea was a legal dodge rather than a constitutional protection. He told Fauci, “You don’t have any rights under the Fifth Amendment because you’ve been pardoned.” “You know that. Your lawyer is sitting behind you now, shifting nervously in their chairs. They know it. This isn’t about the Constitution. This isn’t about the law.”
https://x.com/FoxNews/status/2084627882412810379
Other members made blunt, politically charged statements that made the hearing more than a routine oversight session. Sen. Tommy Tuberville reportedly said Fauci “should be locked up before he leaves this building today,” reflecting the intensity of Republican frustration with Fauci’s refusal to answer basic questions about pandemic decisions and communications.
The committee vote on the contempt resolution will determine whether the issue moves to the Senate floor, where a majority could approve a formal contempt citation. If the Senate passes the resolution, the likely next step would be a referral to the Justice Department for potential prosecution, an outcome that would turn the dispute from oversight to a legal battle.
Legal scholars differ on the strength of the House GOP argument about pardons and Fifth Amendment rights, but Senate Republicans are treating the matter as both a legal and political test. For conservative lawmakers, pressing the contempt claim is positioned as enforcing accountability and signaling that executive and advisory officials cannot ignore congressional subpoenas without consequence.
Whatever the legal merits, the contempt push escalates tensions around pandemic-era decisions and the role of federal health officials. The coming committee vote will show how far Senate Republicans are willing to press those fights, and whether they can translate committee action into a full Senate move and a potential law enforcement referral.
