Quick take: Anthony Fauci’s legal choices, a seized iPhone, released diaries and mounting Republican scrutiny paint a picture of why his defense team looks the way it does and why investigators are pushing hard for more records.

Anthony Fauci hiring David Schertler makes sense once you line up the stakes and the history. Schertler’s resume includes high-profile, damage-control work, and Fauci’s decision to claim the Fifth more than 100 times during his July 29 appearance before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee signaled he expected a fight. A contempt vote is scheduled for tomorrow morning after the committee said Fauci partially waived those protections by delivering prepared remarks.

The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, led by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), has obtained a copy of Fauci’s iPhone, and that is a major development. Devices like that can contain unfiltered notes, messages and metadata that diaries and redacted files don’t show. His HHS-stored diaries already painted a picture of someone with an outsized view of his own role; the phone could add context that changes the narrative further.

There are growing signs that Fauci’s internal thinking diverged sharply from his public posture, and some Republicans are convinced the records will show it. Reporting has suggested he likely understood the COVID pandemic might have stemmed from a lab leak, which undercuts the early, more definitive public denials. Those are the kinds of gaps investigators and critics want to see explained with original-source material rather than carefully curated statements.

A Senate panel investigating Dr. Anthony Fauci has obtained a copy of the doctor’s iPhone, potentially securing even more records related to the doctor’s actions during the Covid-19 pandemic.

https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/2085149641859830105

[…]

This revelation comes just days after copies of Fauci’s journals were publicly released following their transfer from HHS to Congress. Two Republican senators, Johnson and Rand Paul of Kentucky, have increased pressure on Fauci in recent days to answer questions related to pandemic health measures and the origins of Covid-19.

[…]

Fauci used the phone during his time as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, according to a spokeswoman for Johnson, whose subcommittee obtained the phone records. Fauci played a central role during the Trump administration’s response to the pandemic in 2020, publicly contradicting President Trump at times and urging more public caution than some political figures, which made him an enemy of Trump loyalists. 

Fauci stayed in the government for the beginning of the Biden administration and retired in 2022. Former President Joe Biden pardoned Fauci as one of his final acts in office amid concerns that Republicans could try and indict him for his actions during the pandemic.

[…]

The phone could be part of more public document dumps on the way: Paul and Johnson have received millions of additional Fauci-related pages from government servers, people familiar with the matter said, and are still pressing for more. And at least four Republican-led states have meanwhile launched their own investigations into Fauci. 

What investigators want is straightforward: unredacted communications, contemporaneous notes and any evidence of coordination that contradicts public explanations. The iPhone could contain text threads, calendar entries and attachments that prove when and how key decisions were made. For Republicans pressing accountability, those records are the fastest route to answers the public deserves.

Fauci’s courtroom future is already a topic of conservative commentary, with pundits predicting prolonged litigation. As Bill O’Reilly said this week, he could see Fauci being caught in an “endless cycle of courtrooms” in the next five years. That assessment is part practical legal reality and part political theater; either way, it means this story will not vanish quietly.

Republicans pushing the inquiries argue the stakes go beyond one man’s reputation. They point to policy decisions that shut down businesses, disrupted lives and imposed constraints on medical practice, all made under a veil of technical certainty many now question. If the phone and the diary entries show discrepancies between private beliefs and public messaging, those matters move from academic to actionable.

From a legal strategy standpoint, the hire of Schertler and a heavy Fifth Amendment posture fit together. When potential exposure is wide and the factual record is incomplete, well-known defense counsel and a refusal to testify can be the only rational short-term response. But the long-term consequence could be exactly what critics demand: sustained legal battles, more document releases and pressure on pension and post-retirement benefits.

The Republican case is simple and relentless: transparency, accountability, and consequences if officials misled the public or misused their office. The incoming flood of material — diaries, government server pages and that iPhone copy — will give lawmakers and state investigators more to parse. Whatever the phone contains, the political and legal fallout will be measured in years, not weeks.